Lately, I’ve noticed some paid platforms imposing punitive measures on content creators who don’t disclose their use of AI. That sets a troubling precedent for several reasons.
First, why the hostility toward AI? It’s just another assistive technology. If we’re going to penalize creatives for using tools without disclosing them, then shouldn’t we demand full transparency for all assistive technologies? Or is AI somehow “special”?
Should painters disclose the type of brushes they use – Russian sable versus nylon? Is one more “authentic” than the other? If you’ve never painted with either, my sarcasm might be lost on you. Should writers be required to disclose their use of a word processor that corrects grammar and typos? What about using a ballpoint pen instead of a fountain pen, since the former allows for faster, uninterrupted writing?
Every major technological leap has been met with resistance, often from those who fear change. But you can’t put the genie back in the bottle – evolution doesn’t yield. Yes, things will be different. And yes, some people will misuse AI. But that’s human nature.
Instead of penalizing those who embrace progress, let’s encourage them to use AI wisely, often, and for the greater good.
I’m James, and you can safely assume that everything I create – code, art, words, and whatever other wonders come my way – has, in some small way, been influenced and assisted by AI.
Good points, James. But I vehemently object to “therap-a-i”, which I saw introduced on the news last week as a treatment for mental health issues.